Even though Donald Trump is not a fully paid Klan member, many would identify Trump as a supporter of the KKK ideology from his statements and followers. Undoubtedly, the KKK see him as part of their family, maybe as a father figure or an uncle or a grandpa, and according to the popular ‘inbred’ rumour, the same person in a Klan can have those multiple roles. Accordingly, the KKK types went on the streets, and many clips of these racist Xenophobes attacking non-whites and exuberantly shouting Trump appeared online. You may say they are politically empowered now, as they come out of their closets into the open. Similar to what Brexit did here in the UK for many closet racists. And for sure, Trump and Farage form a couple, but only politically, otherwise, according to Trump’s ethos, they would be busy grabbing each other’s testicles.
Still, the stubborn ones say Donald Trump is not a racist but then why he attracts them like a magnet. I am sure if you asked some of his supporters in private they would be happy to endorse a climate where the non-whites would be subjugated. Some even dared to wave slogans like “make America white again”, making reference to its white past when the blacks were subdued as slaves and lynched for public entertainment.
President Trump is a reality that we face now. His pre-election rhetoric echoing the White American concerns about immigrants is perplexing given that America is a nation of immigrants, except the Native Americans population which have shrunk drastically with various historical episodes like the Trail of Tears. Back in 1987, I was in Texas as an undergraduate carrying out some research. The delivery man asked me where I was from as he was attempting to mount the TV in my apartment. To break the ice, I said we are all foreigners here; it is just that your forefathers arrived few hundred years earlier than mine and I smiled. He paused for few seconds, digested what I had said, and carried on working, and then left quickly. He clearly did not share my sense of humour or is it black humour now.
Trump’s supporters argue they are not immigrants even though they arrived from Europe. The likes of Ann Coulter, the Right-Wing Columnist, explained on the LBC Radio Station that the US was born after independence, thus, only those who came afterwards were migrants as the US as a political entity did not exist before. I am sure the forefathers of many in her camp did arrive after the US independence; the migration from Europe continued well into the 20th Century. As for the Native Americans, they don’t count, the Europeans just wondered in like nomads in this barren continent and decided to set up camp.
Now the thorny issue of torture has come to surface, as Donald Trump advocated using Waterboarding, regardless, if it works or not because those evil people deserve it. Note, it is Waterboarding or Sleep Deprivation or Strenuous Position; all classed as Enhanced Interrogation Technique (EIT), because in the civilised world they don’t do torture, and moreover they are busy scorning other nations for such practices. Just remember, others do torture, civilised countries do EIT. Likewise, others do terrorism, and civilised nations do war.
Teresa May has flown to the US to ensure that the special relationship remains alive and she faces pressure at home to distance herself on the issue of torturing prisoners. And the pundits ask, does torture work? The question underlines the philosophy of utility, does it bring benefit. One feels also compelled to ask does slavery bring about the benefit. Yes, it does, and is that enough justification to legalise it?
Maybe Trump was inspired by the horror chamber of Abu-Ghraib when the US soldiers were just letting off some steam according to one nasty US Senator. I guess according to that cultural framework, sodomising a young child in front of their parents and filming it and sharing it later with friends is one way to let off some steam and satisfy some weird fetish!
How can one practice torture and yet condemn other regimes for using such methods? It is only embarrassing if you see and accept the contradiction. Many Americans have difficulty in seeing this inconsistency. Just look the nutty religious flock when their TV Evangelist gets caught with his pants down after a fiery sermon. Only the money-making astute preacher expresses shame, and he repents and weeps on stage, but the tears dry up as soon as he sees his flock of sheep continue to pour donations and turn the other cheek, all because the Devil seduced the helpless preacher. Blame the devil, not the preacher who is doing the work of the good Lord. Similarly, don’t blame Donald, blame those terrorists abroad. However, they are blaming the Americans for their presence and the torture on their lands in the first place. It was Trump that condemned the Iraq invasion for the creation of ISIS.
Let us assume that the US would employ such methods for its security and deterrence. But that works both ways; would America accept that if their citizens are taken captive, they could be tortured similarly by their enemy? I doubt it. Just like when they insult Muslims and Islam it is free speech, and when there is a response, it’s incitement to hate and muzzled.
Never mind the enemies of the US, even the allies are told it will be America first, means they can be discarded if the need arises. On a global scale, will that translate to US unilateralism propelled by this exuberance to make America great? Does this mean Trump will challenge the likes of China or Russia? Highly unlikely, Trump is a typical bully with a track record for targeting people who are far weaker than him, just look at his business ‘ethics’! Hence, this grand strategy will be confined to the minorities and the most vulnerable members at home. Indeed, the American Inquisition has begun, and the question is how far and how long this will continue.
Published on 28th Jan 2017